🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 395+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage sterling silver garnet ring.

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.6 out of 5 (395 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$18.83
$31.38
Sale
βœ“ on the house fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage sterling silver garnet ring.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
immediate Shipping

↩️
handy Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage sterling silver garnet ring.

Vintage sterling silver garnet ring.

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 688901

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Rings

Original Price: $31.38 USD

Sale Price: $18.83 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ at no charge shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days​

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 9677 reviews
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Austin, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
faultless purchase
From my experience, the Vintage sterling silver garnet ring. works well enough so no complaints. Packaging was straightforward.
25 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
After certain use, it does the job and I don’t regret it.
25 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase​
5 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Outstanding quality
To be fair, the Vintage sterling silver garnet ring. works well enough which feels reasonable.
5 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson
10 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Impressed!
So far, the Vintage sterling silver garnet ring. feels okay which feels reasonable.
19 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid quality
After some use, the Vintage sterling silver garnet ring. is uncomplicated to use so I’m okay with it. Works fine so far.
1 people found this helpful