🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 107+ reviews
Vintage ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller 

Old Navy Sweater 3X Women’s Plus Gray Super tender

★★★★★ 4.9 out of 5 (107 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$13​
$21.67
Sale
✓ gratis fulfillment on this item • Limited time offer

Old Navy Sweater 3X Women’s Plus Gray Super smooth

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
express fulfillment
↩️
straightforward Returns

📋 Product Description

Old Navy Sweater 3X Women’s Plus Gray Super smooth

Old Navy Sweater 3X Women’s Plus Gray Super gentle​

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 1119511

Category: Vintage > Clothing > Sweater

Original Price: $21.67 USD

Sale Price: $13 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 shipping & Returns

✓ gratis dispatch on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 5293 reviews
TM
Tyler Mitchell
10 months ago · Cincinnati, OH
★★★★★
fabulous product
So far, the Old Navy Sweater 3X Women’s Plus Gray Super silky performs as expected so no complaints. Packaging was plain.
48 people found this helpful​
MR
Matthew Robinson
9 months ago · Memphis, TN
★★★★★
Outstanding!
Honestly, the Old Navy Sweater 3X Women’s Plus Gray Super velvety is hassle-free to use and it’s fine overall.
15 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young ✓ Verified Purchase
9 months ago · Phoenix, AZ​
★★★★★
Really superb
Personally, it works fine and it works for me.
19 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson ✓ Verified Purchase
3 months ago · Atlanta, GA
★★★★★
Outstanding!
Good performance and quality Old Navy Sweater 3X Women’s Plus Gray Super plush.
18 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark ✓ Verified Purchase
8 months ago · Cincinnati, OH
★★★★★
foremost Old Navy Sweater 3X Women’s Plus Gray Super tender ever
From my experience, the Old Navy Sweater 3X Women’s Plus Gray Super tender works as described so it’s acceptable.
11 people found this helpful